Bitcoin Brief

Sup, freaks.

Housing affordability did not break because of one variable. It broke because policymakers spent years stacking bad policy on top of bad policy and then acted surprised when families could not afford rent, homes, insurance, taxes, and the monthly payment. Loose money, rate suppression, zoning restrictions, population shocks, insurance costs, and artificial supply constraints all flow into the same place: the shelter line item in your life.

Today we are going to look at Fed-linked research that admits immigration shocks hit housing costs, a July 4 weekend heat wave that forced PJM and DOE to lean on emergency power tools, central-bank employees in Australia rejecting a 9.5% raise because lived inflation is eating their wages, and the broader collateral war taking shape between gold, Treasuries, China, and everyone trying to escape the consequences of fiat debasement.

LEAD STORY

Housing Inflation Is Policy All The Way Down

A viral post has been making the rounds claiming that the Biden-era immigration surge caused a 30% increase in home prices and a 20% rise in rents “per Federal Reserve papers.” I do not need that exact sentence to be perfectly packaged by a Fed economist to know the core point is true.

The Biden administration ran an egregious open-border policy. Tens of millions of border encounters occurred over a compressed period, and millions of people were allowed into the country or remained here while the asylum and immigration system buckled under the load. That was not a natural market event. That was policy.

And policy has consequences.

When you dump a massive number of people into a country over a short period of time, many of whom do not arrive with the skills, capital, credit history, income, or productivity to immediately carry their own weight, you create pressure everywhere. Schools. Hospitals. Municipal budgets. Welfare programs. Labor markets. And yes, housing.

Shelter is not magic. If millions of additional people need a place to live, and the supply of homes and apartments does not expand at the same pace, prices go up. Rents go up. Families already living paycheck to paycheck get squeezed harder. Young people trying to buy their first home get pushed further away from the starting line. Taxpayers get hit twice: first through the public cost of absorbing the influx, then again through higher shelter costs created by the artificial demand shock.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia paper by Albert Saiz gives the clean academic version of this mechanism. Saiz studied American metro areas and found that an immigration inflow equal to 1% of a city’s population was associated with roughly a 1% increase in rents and housing values. He also looked at the Mariel Boatlift as a natural experiment. Miami’s renter population rose by about 9% in one year and rents rose about 8% more than comparison cities.

That is exactly what common sense would tell you before the economists finish building the model. More people competing for constrained housing means higher prices.

Fed officials have started saying versions of this out loud. Governor Adriana Kugler said in 2025 that post-pandemic population growth accelerated partly because of higher immigration and cited research finding that rent growth rises after immigration waves. Governor Stephen Miran later cited Saiz directly and argued that forecasters underappreciated immigration policy’s effect on rent inflation. Miran said Saiz found an elasticity of rents with respect to the number of renters of about 1, and argued that net zero immigration going forward would imply roughly 1 percentage point lower rent inflation per year compared to the prior baseline.

That should infuriate people. The same class of policymakers that gave us monetary debasement, rate suppression, artificial housing scarcity, and open-border chaos wants to act like housing inflation is an unfortunate weather pattern. It is not. It is the direct result of decisions made by people with power.

They printed the money. They suppressed rates. They let housing become a financial asset first and a place to live second. They strangled supply with zoning, permitting, and regulatory friction. Then they layered a massive immigration-driven demand shock on top of a housing market that was already broken.

And ordinary Americans got the bill.

This is why immigration policy cannot be separated from economics. It is not “mean” to point out that importing millions of low-productivity people into a high-cost welfare state creates costs. It is basic arithmetic. If the people coming in consume more public resources than they produce, the burden falls on everyone else. If they need housing immediately in markets where supply is already tight, rents rise. If government subsidizes the demand side while restricting supply, prices rise even more.

The people who want open borders never want to talk about the downstream effects. They talk about compassion in the abstract while working families pay the rent increase in the real world.

Bitcoin does not fix zoning. It does not build houses. It does not control the border. But bitcoin does give people a way to save outside a political and monetary system that keeps creating these problems, denying the consequences, and forcing productive people to eat the loss.

You are not supposed to need leverage, real estate speculation, or political connections to preserve purchasing power. You are supposed to be able to work, save, and build a life. The fiat political machine broke that deal.

Sources: Patrick Webb X post, Albert Saiz Philadelphia Fed working paper, Federal Reserve speeches from Adriana Kugler and Stephen Miran, CBP/HUD/White House immigration and housing data.

SIGNAL

PJM’s July 4 Stress Test Shows The Grid Needs More Generation

The heat wave that hit the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic around the July 4 weekend was a useful stress test for the largest grid operator in the country. PJM entered the holiday stretch under hot weather alerts, maximum generation alerts, load management alerts, and federal emergency orders. On July 1, PJM said it expected roughly 166,147 MW of peak load for July 2. On July 2, it raised that figure to roughly 166,241 MW, a level PJM said would exceed its existing record summer hourly integrated peak.

The important part is not simply that people used more air conditioning when it got hot. The important part is what PJM and the Department of Energy had to do to keep the system reliable. DOE issued an emergency order allowing PJM to dispatch emissions-limited generating units up to maximum output when needed for reliability, even if those units would otherwise run into air-quality, wastewater, fuel-throughput, or other permit limitations. DOE also authorized PJM to direct backup generation at large-load sites, including data centers and other industrial or commercial facilities, as a last resort before firm load interruption.

That is the whole energy debate in one weekend. When demand spikes, the grid does not run on press releases. It runs on dispatchable generation, transmission capacity, demand response, backup power, and operators with room to maneuver.

If the emergency answer is to waive constraints and lean harder on fossil plants and backup generators, the honest long-term answer is not pretending scarcity can be managed with slogans. The answer is more generation, faster interconnection, more transmission where it makes sense, more nuclear, more natural gas, more coal where it is needed, more geothermal, more batteries, more demand response, and a market structure that rewards reliable capacity before the emergency hits.

This is where bitcoin mining and flexible compute should be part of the conversation instead of treated like villains. Flexible loads can soak up excess power when the grid has it and shut down when homes need it. But flexible demand only helps at the margin. The real bottleneck is still generation abundance. America is trying to electrify everything, onshore manufacturing, power AI data centers, and keep households comfortable through heat waves.

That requires building like we mean it.

Sources: DOE June 30 emergency orders, PJM July 1 and July 2 hot weather operations updates.

RBA Staff Reject 9.5% Raise As Lived Inflation Bites

Reserve Bank of Australia staff rejected a proposed 9.5% pay rise, with the union saying wages are falling “dangerously behind” inflation and comparable employers. That is a funny thing to hear from inside a central bank.

This is Australia, not the U.S. Federal Reserve. The specific bank is the Reserve Bank of Australia, and the headline came from the Australian Financial Review: “Bullock faces pay headache as RBA staff reject 9.5pc wage rise.” Michele Bullock is the RBA governor.

The reason this belongs in the Brief is simple. Central-bank employees are behaving like inflation is higher than the official comfort language suggests. They can publish sanitized inflation prints all day. Wage negotiations reveal the truth in the wild.

The people closest to the monetary bureaucracy know what everyone buying groceries, paying rent, and keeping a family afloat already knows. The official numbers may say one thing. The lived reality says another.

Source: Australian Financial Review.

Capital Wars 1.0, Not China Shock 2.0

Michael Howell’s latest Capital Wars note frames the current macro fight as “Capital Wars 1.0, Not China Shock 2.0.” That framing is useful because it moves the conversation away from the old manufacturing-displacement story and toward the thing that matters more in this phase of the cycle: collateral.

Gold, U.S. Treasuries, China’s paper yuan ambitions, dollar liquidity, and the plumbing of global credit are all part of the same fight. This is not simply about who makes the cheapest goods. It is about who controls the balance sheet assets that the rest of the system treats as money-good collateral.

That is why gold keeps catching a bid. That is why Treasuries remain the center of the global funding machine even as foreign buyers grumble about deficits and debasement. That is why China wants a bigger international currency footprint but still has to fight the trust problem that comes with capital controls and political discretion.

And that is why bitcoin keeps sitting there as the inconvenient asset outside the paper-claim hierarchy. No issuer. No committee. No capital-control button. No promise from a ministry or a central bank. Just bearer settlement enforced by proof of work and full nodes.

The capital war is a trust war. It always was.

Source: Michael Howell, Capital Wars.

James Check Says Bitcoin Is Approaching The End Zone

James Check’s latest Orange Monthly argued that bitcoin was approaching what he hopes can be called the end of the bear market, measured by both price and duration. That read looks pretty prescient after today’s price action.

Bitcoin jumped back above $63,000 after trading near the $58,000 lows at the end of June. That does not mean the market is suddenly easy. It means the structure Check has been tracking deserves attention. When forced sellers get exhausted, short-term holders get washed out, long-term holders sit tight, and price starts reclaiming lost ground, the market can turn before the crowd is emotionally ready for it.

The important thing is not trying to nail the exact day the market turns. That is a sucker’s game. The important thing is recognizing when the character of the market is changing. Bitcoin cycles are psychological and mechanical at the same time. People capitulate. Coins move from weak hands to strong hands. Miners and levered tourists get washed out. Then the market eventually finds its footing in a way that looks obvious only in hindsight.

If Check is right that we are nearing the end zone, today’s jump above $63,000 is exactly the type of move that should remind freaks why conviction matters before everyone else feels comfortable again.

Source: Checkonchain Orange Monthly and live Kraken XBT/USD price data.

Bitcoin Optech: Quiet Technical Work Continues

Bitcoin Optech’s latest newsletter says there was no significant news this week, which is often a good thing. The protocol does not need a circus every week to keep improving. The work continues in mailing-list discussions, release candidates, infrastructure software, and debates around consensus changes.

This week’s issue includes discussion around changing Bitcoin’s consensus rules, post-quantum signature aggregation work using STARKs, and notable updates across Bitcoin infrastructure projects. None of this is likely to make cable news. That is fine. The most important work in bitcoin usually happens quietly.

Bitcoin wins because boring people do boring work for a very long time. That is a compliment.

Source: Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #412.

Sponsored

Sponsored

⚡ FREEDOM TECH CORNER

Download The Bitcoin Home Mining And Energy Playbook

The PJM story is a good reminder that energy is not an abstract policy debate. It is the base layer of modern life, and bitcoiners should understand it better than anyone.

Download the Bitcoin Home Mining Playbook we put together with Exergy and use it as a starting point for thinking through heat reuse, home mining, power costs, load flexibility, and how a miner can become more than a noisy box in the basement. The goal is not to LARP as an energy expert. The goal is to understand how bitcoin mining, home energy systems, and practical resilience fit together before the next heat wave, storm, or grid scare forces the lesson on you.

Start here: https://www.tftc.io/home-mining-energy-playbook

DATA SNAPSHOT

That is it for today, freaks.

The theme running through all of this is simple: reality eventually overwhelms managed narratives. Housing inflation shows up in the rent check. Grid fragility shows up when the heat wave hits. Lived inflation shows up when central-bank employees reject a 9.5% raise. Collateral stress shows up when every major power starts fighting over gold, Treasuries, and settlement rails.

The fix is not more narrative management. It is more truth, more capacity, more savings technology, more reliable infrastructure, and fewer chokepoints controlled by people who created the problem in the first place.

See you tomorrow,

Marty

Forward this to a freak who knows housing inflation is policy.

YouTube · Podcasts