
Nation-state reserves are accelerating.
Welcome to this week's roundup of the most intriguing predictions from recent TFTC episodes. Let's dive straight into what our guests have forecasted about Bitcoin, AI, and the broader economy.
Brian Morgenstern, head of policy at Riot, predicts that the U.S. government will aggressively acquire Bitcoin for its strategic reserve through multiple channels. This follows President Trump's executive order launching the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Morgenstern explains that the administration is currently collecting various ideas for acquisition methods.
As Morgenstern reports from his Washington insider perspective, "He's made it clear that the government's position, the Trump administration's position, is they want to acquire as much [Bitcoin] as possible. He said it's like asking somebody how much gold do you want or how much any other valuable asset that you want. If you want to be a superpower you want as much of it as you can get."
Several methods are being considered, including: revaluing gold certificates to unlock up to a trillion dollars that could partially fund Bitcoin purchases; creating BitBonds (Bitcoin-backed Treasury bonds); monetizing government-owned properties like hydro resources; and forming agreements with private miners operating on federal land where "the government, as part of that agreement, is paid rent in Bitcoin." Morgenstern believes we'll see more clarity in the coming months through the President's 180-day report on the initiative.
Brian Harrington believes Bitcoin will reach a price of $1 million dollars in the relatively near future. Though he doesn't explicitly state a specific timeline during this conversation, he references the possibility as a reality that both he and host Marty Bent are moving toward, indicating it's not a distant possibility but something that could happen in the next 4-5 years.
Harrington explains a fascinating perspective on what needs to happen for Bitcoin to reach this milestone: "I don't think Bitcoin can go to a million dollars until like Marty Bent becomes that person that is doing that... until I'm five years different from who we just talked about. I don't think it can do that until I'm a person, not inside about me, it's not about you, but like, I don't think it can do that until we as people are bigger containers, like with bigger opportunity than than we are right now."
His prediction isn't just about market dynamics but about how Bitcoiners need to become more influential in various spheres. "Until Bitcoin can be credibly shared in those kind of influential environments, it as a thing is not going to grow large enough to do everything we think it's going to be," Harrington states. This connection between Bitcoin's price potential and the personal growth of its advocates represents a unique take on what will drive Bitcoin to seven figures.
Jim Carucci predicts a future where autonomous AI agents will negotiate with each other, specialize in different areas, and "hire and subcontract each other in real time" to accomplish complex tasks on behalf of users. This machine-payable web will form the backbone of a new economic system.
Crucially, Carucci believes Bitcoin will serve as the monetary foundation for this AI economy: "I think Bitcoin makes the most sense because now you can delegate a Bitcoin budget to an agent and have it run in real time." When asked why not use stablecoins or traditional payment rails, he explains that Bitcoin offers censorship resistance, global accessibility, and privacy through onion routing that other payment methods can't match.
According to Carucci, this system will resemble a real economy where specialized agents provide services to other agents. "So do you want central planning? Right? Do you want to go to the Politburo to but go about your daily life, or do you want to just have an open internet?" The implication is clear: an AI agent economy using Bitcoin creates a more efficient, freer system than centralized alternatives that might emerge. While Carucci doesn't provide a specific timeline, he's actively building infrastructure for this future through his company Cascador.
The Bitcoin community is divided over how to handle the looming quantum computing threat to cryptocurrency security. In response to Jameson Lopp's proposal to "burn" quantum-vulnerable coins, venture partner Guillaume Girard argues this would violate Bitcoin's fundamental principles.
Girard contends that labeling the process as "burning" rather than "confiscation" is semantic manipulation: "This is preventive confiscation of perfectly valid coins, vulnerable or not." He warns this creates a slippery slope where today's security justifications become tomorrow's arbitrary seizures.
While acknowledging the catastrophic potential of quantum theft that could "crash bitcoin to zero," Girard struggles with the moral implications of inaction versus intervention.
The article presents a third option beyond burning or allowing theft: "Hourglass," proposed by Hunter Beast, which would limit quantum-vulnerable transactions to one per block, potentially creating "bidding wars" that redistribute funds to miners through high fees.
Technical challenges remain, as quantum-resistant signatures are significantly larger than traditional ones, increasing transaction sizes, fees, and computational requirements.
The debate continues as the community weighs mathematical purity against practical security in this unprecedented technological challenge.
Subscribe to them here (seriously, you should): https://newsletter.blockspacemedia.com/
Ten31, the largest bitcoin-focused investor, has deployed $150M across 30+ companies through three funds. I am a Managing Partner at Ten31 and am very proud of the work we are doing. Learn more at ten31.vc/invest.
Get this newsletter sent to your inbox daily: https://www.tftc.io/bitcoin-brief/
Subscribe to our YouTube channels and follow us on Nostr and X: